Compare HCL AppScan vs. Seeker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,854 views|37,366 comparisons
HCL AppScan Logo
14,871 views|10,156 comparisons
Seeker Logo
views| comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
Learn
Veracode
HCL
Synopsys
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your web app security posture and identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about HCL AppScan
Learn more about Seeker
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerEssex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS ITAccessOne, Rally®, Calix, FINRA, Dextra Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Healthcare Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
Government33%
Insurance Company22%
Aerospace/Defense Firm11%
Transportation Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company7%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise67%
REVIEWERS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise77%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HCL AppScan is ranked 14th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews while Seeker is ranked unranked in Application Security Testing (AST). HCL AppScan is rated 7.6, while Seeker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes "Allows for dynamic scanning but lacks easy CI/CD integration". On the other hand, HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, OWASP Zap and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Seeker is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.