Compare Hedvig vs. LizardFS

Hedvig is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while LizardFS is ranked 14th in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Hedvig is rated 0, while LizardFS is rated 0. On the other hand, Hedvig is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, ScaleIO and Nutanix, whereas LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Red Hat Gluster Storage and VMware vSAN.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hedvig Logo
1,892 views|1,340 comparisons
LizardFS Logo
5,122 views|3,685 comparisons
Ranking
Views
1,892
Comparisons
1,340
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
5,122
Comparisons
3,685
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Red Hat, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: October 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Learn
CommVault
LizardFS
Overview

Hedvig is the world's only private, hybrid and multi-cloud software defined storage platform for primary and secondary data. Hedvig stores, protects, and replicates data across multiple sites as well as private and public clouds.

The Hedvig Distributed Storage Platform is a single software-defined storage solution that meets all of your primary, secondary, and cloud data needs.

Hedvig provides a distributed storage fabric that provides cloud-like elasticity, simplicity, and flexibility. With Hedvig you can cut storage costs by 60% or more while accelerating your cloud transformation.

Visit us at www.hedvig.io

Software Defined Storage LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system. It allows users to combine disk space located on many servers into a single name space which is visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. SDS LizardFS makes files secure by keeping all the data in many replicas spread over available servers. It can be used also to build an affordable storage, because it runs without any problems on commodity hardware. Disk and server failures are handled transparently without any downtime or loss of data. If storage requirements grow, it's possible to scale an existing SDS LizardFS installation just by adding new servers _ at any time, without any downtime. The system will automatically move some data to newly added servers, because it continuously takes care of balancing disk usage across all connected nodes. Removing servers is as easy as adding a new one.
Offer
Learn more about Hedvig
Learn more about LizardFS
Sample Customers
GE Digital, Scania, LKAB, Pittsburg StateOrange Polska, Platige Image
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Red Hat, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: October 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email