We performed a comparison between Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats."
"One or two people can maintain and support the solution. The maintenance is not difficult."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pros →
"The timeline and machine learning features are great."
"The most valuable features would have to be the products' ability to customize vulnerability management settings."
"This is a good tool to have because it gives you the ability to track what is currently happening in your environment."
"It'll get you from point A to B."
"The solution is relatively easy to use."
"No doubt about it, the solution is extremely stable."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics's most important feature is its ease of use."
"The threat hunting capabilities in general are great."
"Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System can improve by having more anti-spam features that will hopefully eliminate all of the other threats."
"The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Cons →
"The features that could be improved include the licensing model and the dashboards and all those presentations. Overall, the user experience part can be improved."
"QRadar needs a lot of fine tuning"
"We sometimes get an error about the hard drive. Approximately once in two months, we can't find the logs, and they go missing, which is a terrible issue. We are getting support for this issue from our support company."
"The implementation and configuration are not easy."
"The product can be a bit complex."
"QRadar needs to be more specialized, along the lines of what other SIEM solutions are."
"The only problem is that if you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. We would need to increase the storage capacity."
"The quality of technical support depends on the IBM support person. Sometimes, it's hard to get the right person on the other side. A ticket coordinator could be the key to better quality delivery."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is ranked 22nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is rated 7.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System writes "Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.