We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and OpenText Silk Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
Earn 20 points
CucumberStudio is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 8 reviews while OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools. CucumberStudio is rated 8.2, while OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
