• Home
  • Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BladeSymphony
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Learn More
Hitachi Vantara
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.
Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.