We performed a comparison between Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] and INFINIDAT InfiniBox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Vantara, IBM, Dell Technologies and others in Frame-Based Disk Arrays."The most valuable features are simplified provisioning and management, de-duplication, and built-in encryption."
"This product has good performance."
"Mostly, their support is also great at reacting to issues but moreover, proactive to prevent issues."
"The exterior display needs to be improved."
"The response time for read requests can be improved."
"InfiniBox, right now, offers only asynchronous replication between two storages."
More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Frame-Based Disk Arrays while INFINIDAT InfiniBox is ranked 7th in Enterprise SAN. Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is rated 10.0, while INFINIDAT InfiniBox is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] writes "Good price-performance ratio, provides simplified provisioning and management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of INFINIDAT InfiniBox writes "Good performance, suitable for big data, but the response time could be improved". Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas INFINIDAT InfiniBox is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, NetApp AFF, Dell Unity XT, Dell XtremIO and VMware vSAN.
We monitor all Frame-Based Disk Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.