• Home
  • Digital Safe vs. OpenText Content Manager

Digital Safe vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Smarsh Logo

Digital Safe

Read 1 Digital Safe review
134 views|71 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

OpenText Content Manager

Read 21 OpenText Content Manager reviews
200 views|89 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital Safe and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Solid product, functionally rich, but complex.
Giovanny-Buitrago
A solution for managing content with low maintenance
The first advantage is integration with your IP directory. You can customize any metadata and centralize all content, making it accessible to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

    • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Conte...
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs. You will have to pay more… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 23 in File Archiving
    Views
    134
    Comparisons
    71
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 23 in File Archiving
    Views
    200
    Comparisons
    89
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Digital Safe, Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Digital Safe
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Smarsh
    OpenText
    Overview
    Autonomy Zantaz is a highly scalable and flexible archiving platform that enables your organization to capture and preserve email messages, attachments, and files in a way that both optimizes storage and allows immediate access for discovery and review by courts, regulators, administrators, and end-users. Powered by IDOL, EAS automates the processing of enormous volumes of information, dynamically exposing the patterns, linkages and meaning within.

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Sample Customers
    EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    File Archiving
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Digital Safe is ranked 9th in File Archiving while OpenText Content Manager is ranked 5th in File Archiving with 21 reviews. Digital Safe is rated 8.0, while OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Digital Safe writes "Solid product, functionally rich, but complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". Digital Safe is most compared with , whereas OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Microsoft Purview Records Management.

    See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

    We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.