Anonymous UserDatabase Administrator at a manufacturing company
Manuel CostaSystem Administrator - Infrastructure Area Coordinator at a media company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."
"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."
"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the snapshot and clone capabilities."
"Compared to the traditional way we did backups, with Snapshot it takes us less time. It has improved my organization by saving us time."
"This is a very mature product that does exactly what it needs to in taking temporary pictures of data states."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"It has a user-friendly interface."
"The solution is fast and it doesn't use any disc space at all. You can also take as many snapshots as you like. These are the solution's most valuable features."
"SnapMirror and Snapshot are both very reliable products."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the repurposing and backup features."
"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."
"I would like to see cloud features added to the next release of this solution."
"Not a perfect ten because there is one point off to give it room for improvement."
"Although support is good, the global support is lacking depending on location."
"The solution needs to ensure it has higher availability or business continuity."
"I think the automation needs some improvement."
"The price could be a bit lower."
"The company could update their products more regularly."
"The solution could include more databases and make it accessible to the DBAs. The automation process should be run in a way where it could be run from the database itself."
"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."
"The price of this solution is fair."
"It's not too expensive."
"As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."
NetApp Snapshot point-in-time copy software protects data with no performance impact and uses minimal storage space.
HVR Software is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 3 reviews while NetApp Snapshot is ranked 1st in Data Replication with 11 reviews. HVR Software is rated 8.0, while NetApp Snapshot is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HVR Software writes "Has one central interface that manages everything and is easy and quick to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Snapshot writes "Very user-friendly, extremely stable, and scalable". HVR Software is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Oracle GoldenGate, AWS Database Migration Service, SSIS and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas NetApp Snapshot is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Dell EMC AppSync, Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication and EDB Postgres Replication Server. See our HVR Software vs. NetApp Snapshot report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.