We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Video and StarLeaf based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings."I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with."
"The pros are that it's like a global leader. It has a translation project, which is very interesting and important for our users because the minority of them are not able to read and speak in English."
"They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that."
"We have had some problems with stability. A week ago, we had outaging but it has stablized."
IBM Cloud Video is ranked 46th in Virtual Meetings while StarLeaf is ranked 42nd in Virtual Meetings. IBM Cloud Video is rated 8.0, while StarLeaf is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Video writes "Great user interface and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StarLeaf writes "Easy to use for our clients and was easy to roll out ". IBM Cloud Video is most compared with , whereas StarLeaf is most compared with .
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
