Compare IBM CPQ vs. Siebel

IBM CPQ is ranked 9th in Product Configuration and Quoting while Siebel is ranked 4th in Product Configuration and Quoting. IBM CPQ is rated 0, while Siebel is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM CPQ is most compared with Oracle CPQ Cloud and Siebel, whereas Siebel is most compared with Oracle CPQ Cloud, Oracle E-Business Suite and IBM CPQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM CPQ Logo
232 views|178 comparisons
Siebel Logo
591 views|416 comparisons
Ranking
Views
232
Comparisons
178
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
591
Comparisons
416
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 75% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Sterling CPQ, Sterling Commerce CPQ
Learn
IBM
Oracle
Overview
IBM CPQ Configure, Price, Quote enables your sales team and channel partners to accurately configure, price, quote, and order complex products and services. IBM CPQ Configure, Price, Quote automates your most challenging selling processes with the configuration, pricing and quoting of complex products, services, and bundles. Our product can guide your sales, call center representatives, and partners in selecting and validating the right products. Learn more: https://www.ibm.com/marketplace/cloud/cpq-software/us/en-us
Information Not Available
Offer
Learn more about IBM CPQ
Learn more about Siebel
Sample Customers
First Data Hellas, Tienda Diabetes, AC Portal B.V., Bigcommerce, NSS International Corp., LookHunters, Carus PBS Ab LtdHover Automotive India, Smiles, Bouygues Telecom, Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, Lawn Tennis Association Boosts Tennis, Southwest Airlines
We monitor all Product Configuration and Quoting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.