We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."
"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."
"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 36th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 28 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Though it is scalable and has an easy setup phase in place, the solution is an expensive one ". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Acunetix and Orca Security, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Amazon Inspector.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.