Anonymous UserIngeniero de proyectos de TI at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"It can have more integration."
"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
"The solution is not too expensive."
Earn 20 points
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment scans data infrastructures (databases, data warehouses and big data environments) to detect vulnerabilities, and suggests remedial actions. The solution identifies exposures such as missing patches, weak passwords, unauthorized changes and misconfigured privileges.
Tenable.io Vulnerability Management provides the most accurate information about all your assets and vulnerabilities in ever-changing environments. Available for cloud or on-prem deployment, Tenable.io features a streamlined interface, intuitive guidance, and seamless integrations that help security teams maximize efficiency. When visibility and insight matter most, Tenable.io helps you truly understand your Cyber Exposure.
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 12th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews while Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is ranked 7th in Vulnerability Management with 7 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 8.0, while Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Good reporting, integrates well, and vulnerability assessments can be performed quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management writes "Very mature and quite stable but could use a better user interface". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VM and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable SC, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Snyk. See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable.io Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.