Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management.
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs. The enterprise product is too expensive for smaller companies, however, they really are looking for a product like this in the market. It's too technologically advanced for SMBs - Tenable is kind of a little bit like flying a 747. There's a lot of bells and whistles and switches and things like that, that quite frankly are not used or not understood largely by the average user. If they don't begin to cater to smaller organizations, they'll likely lose market share. They could use a better user interface that could be developed a lot better than it is. It really could be more intuitive.
The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable.
An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons.
We had some challenges with the implementation because of Docker Version 2, although with help from the support team, we were able to proceed. It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have. The information is not available on the web site and they should be more upfront about it.
I don't have any issues with the solution at this time, and I don't think there are any features that are missing or could be added. The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously.
We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information.
Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!