Compare IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. IBM Information Governance Catalog

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 23 in Metadata Management
Views
382
Comparisons
341
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 23 in Metadata Management
Views
2,749
Comparisons
2,250
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
118
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server
Learn More
Overview

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog (IGC) is a web-based tool that allows you to explore, understand and analyze information. You can create, manage and share a common business language, document and enact policies and rules and track data lineage. Combine with Watson Knowledge Catalog (WKC) to leverage existing curated data sets and extend your on-premises IGC investment to the cloud. A knowledge catalog allows you to put collected metadata into the hands of knowledge workers so data science and analytics communities can get easy access to the best assets for their purpose while still adhering to enterprise governance requirements.

IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a market-leading data integration platform which includes a family of products that enable you to understand, cleanse, monitor, transform, and deliver data, as well as to collaborate to bridge the gap between business and IT. InfoSphere Information Server provides massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities to deliver a highly scalable and flexible integration platform that handles a variety of data volumes (big, small, and everything in between).
Offer
Learn more about IBM Information Governance Catalog
Learn more about IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Sample Customers
Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City
Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider15%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. IBM Information Governance Catalog and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Information Governance Catalog is ranked 12th in Metadata Management while IBM InfoSphere Information Server is ranked 5th in Metadata Management with 2 reviews. IBM Information Governance Catalog is rated 0.0, while IBM InfoSphere Information Server is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Information Server writes "Improves efficiency through significant time reductions in ETL tasks". IBM Information Governance Catalog is most compared with IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog and erwin Data Catalog, whereas IBM InfoSphere Information Server is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle GoldenGate, Qlik Replicate, IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog and Talend Open Studio.

See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.