We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."InfoSphere Streams was the one core product from the platform in which we were using. We were building a real-time response system and we built it on InfoSphere Streams."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"The UI was not interactive: Responses used to be very slow and hang up at times."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
Earn 20 points
IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Hadoop while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] writes "The BIQSQL implementation is fully SQL ANSI compliant, but I have found a lot of issues in Fluid Query". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
