• Home
  • IBM Integrated Archive Platform vs. OpenText InfoArchive

IBM Integrated Archive Platform vs OpenText InfoArchive comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Integrated Archive Platform and OpenText InfoArchive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Integrated Archive Platform?
Anonymous User
A solution that helps us sunset applications and manages data
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about OpenText InfoArchive?
Top Answer:It has a strong XML engine for reading data and making it indexed and searchable.
What needs improvement with OpenText InfoArchive?
Top Answer:Something can be improved with every product. They can continue to grow the solution to scale it and make it easier to configure. It requires a decent amount of XL mapping. They should also have more… more »
What is your primary use case for OpenText InfoArchive?
Top Answer:The two main use cases are for sunsetting applications and keeping data when you don't want to pay the full licensing costs for the application. For example, for archival purposes, you may need to… more »
Ranking
10th
out of 23 in File Archiving
Views
81
Comparisons
51
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
out of 23 in File Archiving
Views
788
Comparisons
327
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
IBM
OpenText
Overview
IBM Archive and Essence Manager (AREMA) is a fully artificial intelligence (AI) integrated, multi-function solution to improve agility of file-based media production and distribution workflows. AREMA orchestrates any file-based broadcast production workflow - providing full control of a broadcaster's production processes.

OpenText InfoArchive is a modern archive solution and cloud-based service for compliant archiving of both structured and unstructured information highly-accessible, scalable and economical.

Sample Customers
Ilmarinen, Integra LifeSciences Corp., Datamolino, Razorsight, Priceline.com
BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Computer Software Company10%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Integrated Archive Platform is ranked 10th in File Archiving while OpenText InfoArchive is ranked 4th in File Archiving with 1 review. IBM Integrated Archive Platform is rated 0.0, while OpenText InfoArchive is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText InfoArchive writes "A solution that helps us sunset applications and manages data". IBM Integrated Archive Platform is most compared with , whereas OpenText InfoArchive is most compared with .

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.