We performed a comparison between IBM Master Data Management on Cloud and Informatica MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, TIBCO, Reltio and others in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions."IBM Master Data Management on Cloud has been valuable because it has helped in the consolidation of services and lots of the cost of administering and centralizing all the management and automation. Additionally, new features are frequently added."
"It is easy to create REST-based interfaces of the master data objects."
"The most valuable features of Informatica MDM are its reliability, match functions, and integration capabilities. The out-of-box functionality of deduplication and built-in data models ensure faster implementation."
"I think that it's a good solution...It is stable because we have the experience to deploy this solution."
"The valuable feature is that we can automate the integration part...It is a stable solution."
"MDM is very stable - it can handle millions of hits daily and still run 24/7."
"I think the integration feature is probably one of the key features in Informatica MDM...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Its data cleansing capabilities are very valuable. The match and merge and the audit trail functionalities are very good."
"I like that Informatica MDM has robust matching technology. Informatica MDM is also porting the external Java applications for validations. I can consider that a must-have. It is also exposed to Rest API calls, and we can engage in real-time integrations with any third-party systems."
"The solution is continually being improved by adding features. They should continue to improve the solution in the future."
"The integration could be a bit better. The process is something new."
"We currently have issues with real-time integration."
"From multiple masters that are there in Informatica MDM, we can improve the financials."
"Informatica MDM could improve the interdependency with integration. The solution sometimes becomes a bit difficult to change considering a lot of interdependency with the integration. There can be some improvement in the workflows and they can introduce more artificial intelligence."
"Informatica MDM has limitations with connectivity."
"The biggest pain point for us is the documentation. Typically, you have to go through knowledge forums and knowledge groups to find out about the syntax issues for interfacing with new products. Typically, you've got to deal with someone who has been through the pain before. Their documents are not really up to date with current innovations happening in the industry. As big as they are, you can't really expect it, but that's our pain point."
"Informatica MDM has a complex user interface, which could be improved."
"Pre-sales technical support is much better than post-sales technical support."
Earn 20 points
IBM Master Data Management on Cloud is ranked 13th in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions while Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 43 reviews. IBM Master Data Management on Cloud is rated 0.0, while Informatica MDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Master Data Management on Cloud writes "Effective service consolidation, new features frequent added, and beneficial centralized management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Optimize business processes while ensuring that users see a return on their investment from the use of the product". IBM Master Data Management on Cloud is most compared with IBM InfoSphere MDM and SAS MDM, whereas Informatica MDM is most compared with Reltio Cloud, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, TIBCO EBX and IBM InfoSphere MDM.
See our list of best Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
