Compare Informatica MDM vs. SAP Master Data Governance

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica MDM vs. SAP Master Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"We've used the solution for quite some time, so in our organization, the product is pretty mature.""It has flexibility in extending the data model.""The data quality component is very good.""I like the number of options that are presented with Informatica, fuzzy matching, and your screen."

More Informatica MDM Pros »

"The most valuable thing is what it does: data management.""The solution is great at standardizing all of our records.""Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions.""A good solution for large enterprises.""We've found the solution to be quite flexible."

More SAP Master Data Governance Pros »

"The integration could be a bit better. The process is something new.""The advertising makes promises about data analytics that it does not keep.""Pre-sales technical support is much better than post-sales technical support.""They have too many diversified products. If you don't know Informatica, it's very confusing and feels very idiotic."

More Informatica MDM Cons »

"The user interface is not user-friendly.""Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it.""The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it.""The price can be improved.""The implementation could be easier."

More SAP Master Data Governance Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's pretty high for us. It's more on the higher side, like low to middle high."

More Informatica MDM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost of the product is not ideal.""The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."

More SAP Master Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The scalability of the solution is excellent.
Top Answer: It's expensive, but if you're looking for a stable solution, Informatica is a good one to choose.
Top Answer: * By improving customer service * Integration solutions development * Implementation style.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Siperian, Customer 360
Learn More

Informatica MDM solution delivers the market-leading foundation on which to build that trusted 360-degree view. Companies around the globe rely on Informatica MDM to give business users easy access to the data that drives their strategic decisions about cutting costs, increasing revenues, improving operations, reducing risk, and capitalizing on opportunities. As the industry’s only true end-to-end MDM solution, it incorporates data integration, data quality, data governance, business process management, and master data management on a single vendor-agnostic platform to ensure faster time-to-value.

Your company wants accurate, complete, and trusted supplier data to master your digital business processes and business models. The SAP® Master Data Governance application simplifies the integration of supplier data residing in both SAP and third-party sources. It supports cleansing, standardization, duplicate detection, and best-record calculation. It then lets you synchronize clean and standardized data across cloud and on-premise applications.

Learn more about Informatica MDM
Learn more about SAP Master Data Governance
Sample Customers
UPMC, Citrix
Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm17%
Insurance Company8%
Wellness & Fitness Company8%
Pharma/Biotech Company8%
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Financial Services Firm5%
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise76%
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica MDM vs. SAP Master Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Master Data Management with 3 reviews while SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management with 5 reviews. Informatica MDM is rated 7.4, while SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Good use cases and end-to-end features but needs more setup documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Flexible with good reporting and a very easy to use GUI". Informatica MDM is most compared with IBM InfoSphere MDM, Informatica PIM, Microsoft MDS, Reltio Cloud and Orchestra Networks EBX, whereas SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft MDS, Stibo STEP MDM, Prospecta Master Data Online, SAP Hybris PCM and IBM InfoSphere MDM. See our Informatica MDM vs. SAP Master Data Governance report.

See our list of best Master Data Management vendors and best Cloud Master Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Master Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.