Compare IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The licensing is kind of convoluted. We have to pay licensing costs twice. Once because we're a software as a service (SaaS) company where people access our servers. I have to get the service provider… more »
Top Answer: The solution has failed me maybe twice since I've had it over the course of ten years. The failure was a long time ago, however, and it happened on a different version. RIght now, the current version… more »
Ranking
Views
263
Comparisons
191
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,397
Comparisons
769
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
PowerHA System Mirror
Learn More
Overview
IBM PowerHA technology provides high availability, business continuity and disaster recovery. It enables you to deploy an HA solution that addresses both storage and high availability requirements with one integrated configuration, which offers robust performance along with a simplified user interface. Power Systems is committed to investing in - and bringing to market - solutions designed to keep your IT environments resilient. IBM engineers work continuously to optimize IBM Power Systems hardware and operating systems to keep pace with the increasing demand for 24x365 availability.
Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
Offer
Learn more about IBM PowerHA System Mirror
Learn more about Windows Server Failover Clustering
Sample Customers
Royal Arctic Line, Wªrth Group, Balluff, Al Mansour Holding Company, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising, SAIC FIAT Powertrain Hongyan, Vishay
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider26%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm6%

IBM PowerHA System Mirror is ranked 5th in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews. IBM PowerHA System Mirror is rated 0.0, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "Good reliability and scalability, however the licensing is confusing". IBM PowerHA System Mirror is most compared with Veritas InfoScale Availability, whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD and HPE Serviceguard.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.