We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Netskope Advanced Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."There are a lot of great out-of-the-box features included."
"The features that I have found most valuable in QRadar are its data enrichment, use case creations, and adding references - those kinds of features are very good. Also QRadar's event filtration and device integration are perfect."
"The most valuable features are the AI assistant, which is good at detecting known types of behavior."
"The solution is easy to use, manage, and review all incidents."
"I have found its network traffic log, network bit log, and QBI most valuable."
"This solution has allowed us to correlate logs from multiple sources."
"IBM QRadar has improved my organization by introducing many functions. It collects logs from all of our systems in the organization and has functioned very well. It alerts and correlates the aggregate events or offenses we receive through all the applications we use."
"Technical support is good overall."
"It provides comprehensive reports, including predefined templates tailored for compliance requirements, making it easier to present detailed information to customers."
"The usability of interfaces could be improved."
"Integration could be better. They should make it easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The solution should include remote action capabilities."
"The threat detection needs improvement, they have many false positives."
"There could be improvements made to the UI, the user interface. Though the newer version, 7.3.2, might already have this improvement in place."
"The solution could improve by having more out-of-the-box use cases."
"What needs to be improved in IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is the user experience. It's not optimal. Some screens are a bit clunky. The solution needs to be more user-friendly."
"There is a lot of manual configuration required in order for the product to run smoothly, and I think that it could be made more automatic."
"Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews while Netskope Advanced Analytics is ranked 20th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 1 review. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Netskope Advanced Analytics is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope Advanced Analytics writes "User-friendly experience and customization of workflow with certain scripting challenges". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Netskope Advanced Analytics is most compared with Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Splunk User Behavior Analytics.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.