We performed a comparison between Netskope Advanced Analytics and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."It provides comprehensive reports, including predefined templates tailored for compliance requirements, making it easier to present detailed information to customers."
"This intelligent user behavior analytics package is easy to configure and use while remaining feature filled."
"It is a solution that helps test and measure customer satisfaction."
"The most valuable features are the indexing and powerful search features."
"Because of some of the visualizations that we utilize, we are able to understand strange, unusual traffic on our networks."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"This is a good security product."
"It's straightforward in terms of configuration and troubleshooting and log management and monitoring as well. These are the edge points in addition to it being a modular solution where you can capitalize on your current licenses with extra licensing models, which can match the customer's business requirement and it can help the customer to design or to actually plan for their own roadmap."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible."
"It could be easier to scale the solution if you are using it on-premise, not in the cloud."
"If the price was lowered and the setup process was less complex, I would consider rating it higher."
"They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need."
"The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization."
"We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time."
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Netskope Advanced Analytics is ranked 20th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 1 review while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 2nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 17 reviews. Netskope Advanced Analytics is rated 7.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Netskope Advanced Analytics writes "User-friendly experience and customization of workflow with certain scripting challenges". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Netskope Advanced Analytics is most compared with Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Varonis Datalert and Cynet.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.