We performed a comparison between IBM Secure Gateway Service and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG).Earn 20 points
IBM Secure Gateway Service is ranked 52nd in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) while Perimeter 81 is ranked 8th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 22 reviews. IBM Secure Gateway Service is rated 0.0, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". IBM Secure Gateway Service is most compared with AWS Direct Connect, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Tailscale.
See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.