HCL AppScan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HCLTech Logo
5,557 views|4,286 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
3,643 views|2,821 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL AppScan and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning or security part.""We use it as a security testing application.""We are now deploying less defects to production.""It identifies all the URLs and domains on its own and then performs tests and provides the results.""It's generally a very user-friendly tool. Anyone can easily learn how to scan""I like the recording feature.""The reporting part is the most valuable feature.""It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities.""All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all.""The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.""The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities.""The initial setup is straightforward.""Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use.""The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats.""Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pros →

Cons
"It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.""A desktop version should be added.""In future releases, I would like to see more aggressive reports. I would also like to see less false positives.""IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications.""​IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use​.""They should have a better UI for dashboards.""If HCL AppScan is able to alert the clients over email once the scan is complete, it would be great. Right now, HCL AppScan doesn't let me know if the scanning part is finished or not, because of which I have to come back and check mostly.""Many silly false positives are produced."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap.""It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable.""The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly.""The dashboard could be more user-friendly.""Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific.""The report customization needs to be better.""The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers.""The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
  • "Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
  • "The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
  • More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan generates false results. Sometimes, it incorrectly identifies requests as vulnerable when they are not vulnerable. In the ADSL feature managed, the primary objective is to identify… more »
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan efficiently scans through the website and identifies vulnerabilities for AWS. It is reducing tools day by day, making it more efficient.
    Top Answer:The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
    Top Answer:The platform's technical support services could be better.
    Top Answer:Implementing Tenable.io Web Application Scanning has been beneficial in identifying numerous vulnerabilities within application code. I rate its scanning capabilities in terms of user-friendliness an… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,557
    Comparisons
    4,286
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    7.2
    Views
    3,643
    Comparisons
    2,821
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    322
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

    Sample Customers
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    IMDEX
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Security Firm17%
    Educational Organization17%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    HCL AppScan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HCL AppScan is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 39 reviews while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is ranked 24th in Application Security Tools with 14 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 7.6, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning writes "Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods". HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, Checkmarx One and Contrast Security Assess, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is most compared with Acunetix, SonarQube, Qualys Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Rapid7 AppSpider. See our HCL AppScan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.