IBM Security Network IPS vs LogRhythm UEBA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
446 views|350 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
LogRhythm Logo
417 views|360 comparisons
62% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Security Network IPS and LogRhythm UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS).
To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is simple.""The most valuable feature is its simplicity."

More IBM Security Network IPS Pros →

"Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents.""LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs.""The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting.""The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring.""The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting.""It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring.""What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems.""It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."

More LogRhythm UEBA Pros →

Cons
"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud.""I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."

More IBM Security Network IPS Cons →

"The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other tools. Its machine-learning capabilities need to improve when compared to other solutions. It lacks risk quantification in a single, transparent view for individuals such as CSOs.""What needs improvement in LogRhythm UEBA is the pricing. Here in Asia, for example, in Sri Lanka, pricing is the primary concern, and this is the only area for improvement I see in the product.""The cloud version is lacking and not up to par.""It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved.""The UI could be improved a little bit.""The search feature needs to be improved.""LogRhythm UEBA's data aggregation needs to be improved. Open-source users do not have much documentation available. Documentation is available only for enterprise users.""The product could be user-friendly for someone who doesn’t have any prior experience working with it."

More LogRhythm UEBA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."
  • "The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."
  • "As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."
  • "It is quite a budget-friendly product."
  • "LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."
  • More LogRhythm UEBA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is quite costly. It's high in comparison to other devices.
    Top Answer:Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive.
    Top Answer:The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    446
    Comparisons
    350
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    719
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    417
    Comparisons
    360
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
    LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.

    LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).

    Sample Customers
    Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Security Network IPS is ranked 24th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 4 reviews while LogRhythm UEBA is ranked 12th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 10 reviews. IBM Security Network IPS is rated 7.2, while LogRhythm UEBA is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security Network IPS writes "User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm UEBA writes "Detects unusual logins but dashboards need improvement ". IBM Security Network IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas LogRhythm UEBA is most compared with Wazuh, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and Aruba IntroSpect.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.