Compare IBM solidDB vs. Tibero

IBM solidDB is ranked 12th in Relational Databases with 1 review while Tibero which is ranked 10th in Relational Databases with 1 review. IBM solidDB is rated 9.0, while Tibero is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "‚ÄčNo other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "It uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, Oracle Database In-Memory and SQL Server.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
1,147 views|346 comparisons
Tibero Logo
4,746 views|1,888 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: August 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
Views
1,147
Comparisons
346
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
372
Avg. Rating
9.0
10th
Views
4,746
Comparisons
1,888
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
306
Avg. Rating
9.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 81% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
TmaxSoft
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Tibero
Sample Customers
IskratelNSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: August 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email