Compare IBM solidDB vs. Tibero

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
387 views|194 comparisons
Tibero Logo
1,792 views|1,128 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."

More Tibero Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database.
Top Answer: The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle.
Top Answer: A feature for scheduling database management would be helpful. The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded.
Ranking
30th
Views
387
Comparisons
194
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
Views
1,792
Comparisons
1,128
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
275
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn More
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Tibero
Sample Customers
Iskratel
NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider27%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Government5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM solidDB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases while Tibero is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases with 1 review. IBM solidDB is rated 0.0, while Tibero is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, Oracle Database In-Memory, SQL Server and MariaDB.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.