IBM solidDB vs Tibero

IBM solidDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs Tibero which is ranked 13th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". The top reviewer of Tibero writes "One Of The Easiest Solutions To Scale Both Vertically And Horizontally". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM DB2 and SQL Server. Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, Oracle Database In-Memory and Oracle Multitenant.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs Tibero

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
822
Comparisons
481
Reviews
1
Followers
219
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
2,939
Comparisons
1,465
Reviews
2
Followers
237
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 26% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 16% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 58% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 17% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 5% of the time.
See more Tibero competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDB
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
TmaxSoft
  • Vendor 8144 screenshot 1524949028
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Tibero
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratelNSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email