Compare MySQL vs. Tibero

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MySQL Logo
Read 28 MySQL reviews.
10,972 views|9,018 comparisons
Tibero Logo
2,019 views|1,265 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is very simple. It's easy to use. That's the most important feature.""The solution is free to use, which is its most valuable aspect.""The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I would have worked with our IT team in terms of the initial setup.""Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database.""MySQL is open-source. There are a lot of open-source communities trying to come up with their own patches, and to come up with their own features, which help MySQL develop faster than traditional databases like Oracle, which is closed source.""This specific version of this MySQL has been battle tested for a long time. Any issues are known issues and we pretty much don't have any problems when they're in production. So it's very stable.""This product is a good teaching tool for students who want to learn about networked databases.""This is a lightweight product that is not demanding on the resources, which is what I think gives it the edge."

More MySQL Pros »

"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."

More Tibero Pros »

Cons
"The replication needs improvement. It's becoming a native cloud product like Oracle DB or Cockroach DB.""From a user perspective, the initial setup could be simplified a bit.""I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a little bit more efficient.""Oracle should start putting in some of the enterprise features in the standard feature. There are some key features that should be part of the standard.""They should come up with a better solution than the NDB cluster for better scaling. If they could come up with a better solution for write scaling, apart from the NDB cluster, which is supported by all open source communities, that would be great. Although the NDB cluster, I believe, is an open-source tool, it's not widely supported as a solution.""In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release, one thing that's always missing is dash boarding. There's no real BI tool for MySQL, like there is in Yellowfin and all the different tools that you get. They all have MySQL connectors, but there's no specific BI tool for MySQL. These open source projects have sprung up, but they're more general purpose.""The documentation is pretty weak and should be improved.""The product is a little bit complex and it is difficult to find sufficient documentation."

More MySQL Cons »

"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."

More Tibero Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I am using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge.""This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge.""It's an open-source database management system that can be used free of charge.""Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference.""This product has a good price point.""There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost.""It has a community version.""It is open-source."

More MySQL Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."

More Tibero Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It is easy to use. It is simple to implement, which makes it suitable for our projects because we have deadlines. MySQL is also open-source, which is another plus point.
Top Answer: Its performance should be better. When we use big data, it is slow in performance. We should be able to use mirroring for improved performance.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database.
Top Answer: The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle.
Top Answer: A feature for scheduling database management would be helpful. The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded.
Ranking
3rd
Views
10,972
Comparisons
9,018
Reviews
25
Average Words per Review
674
Rating
7.8
22nd
Views
2,019
Comparisons
1,265
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
275
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

Offer
Learn more about MySQL
Learn more about Tibero
Sample Customers
Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University14%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Comms Service Provider9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm6%
Educational Organization5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider27%
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise38%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MySQL is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 28 reviews while Tibero is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases with 1 review. MySQL is rated 7.8, while Tibero is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle". MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, Oracle Database, SAP HANA, CockroachDB and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, Oracle Database In-Memory, SQL Server and Oracle Multitenant.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.