IBM Spectrum Scale vs Portworx Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
551 views|451 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Pure Storage Logo
703 views|508 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Spectrum Scale and Portworx Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Software Defined Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Portworx Enterprise Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We are using it for monitoring all of our storage.""It has been pretty reliable throughout the years. As far as capacity is concerned, it can handle most heavy loads.""GPFS monitoring is the best feature.""The profile share is a valuable feature.""It makes our file system sharing a lot easier, even across different continents. We have had file systems shared across different continents with no performance degradation.""It is incredibly scalable and stable.""Allows us to share files across multiple environments.""Its great servicing high availability. That is what it is used for."

More IBM Spectrum Scale Pros →

"The solution is user-friendly.""The best thing about Portworx is the Stork, they have called the VPS (Volume Replacement Strategy) and they also have topology awareness, and these are the three features I like.""Portworx is a simple solution. It's similar to Pure Storage products. They're all easy to use and install. You need to have a little expertise with containers to use Portworx, but it will be no problem for you if you understand containers.""A custom IBM script is designed to tackle the storage management challenges within containerized environments, providing crucial data services and features required for enterprise applications.""I like that you have a small dedicated file system that is fast and resilient for containerized workloads.""Portworx virtualizes the aspects of the underlying block storage. That is good because they can also use block storage for their future deployment instead of just NFS."

More Portworx Enterprise Pros →

Cons
"The main issue that we have now is with the encryption. They want to use more metrics in encryption, which is not working very well.""I believe there is no graphic user interface, so they should include it.""Maybe it needs integration with HA.""Integration with other vendors is not available.""The pricing and licensing model for this solution are complex and it is sometimes difficult to explain it to customers.""It would be helpful if there was a graphical user interface that could walk you through the deployment process. The instructions surrounding setup aren't the best. They need to be more step-by-step.""The biggest problem is that it is not able to provide block storage.""They should probably simply the Red Hat implementation portion. This portion was not as straightforward as I would like it to be."

More IBM Spectrum Scale Cons →

"The integration has room for improvement.""They have not integrated Portworx with Ondat since they are too focused now on Pure Storage APIs and not on users like us.""It would be highly advantageous to include an integrated backup solution within the same license, rather than purchasing backup separately.""I think the vendor could provide more training for new users who may not be familiar with containers.""I would like to see a more native mapping to mainframe-type systems.""The documentation could be better."

More Portworx Enterprise Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing is based on the number of terabytes."
  • "The licensing model is complex and depends on factors such as the number of processing cores and the amount of storage."
  • "The solution is costly but reliable."
  • More IBM Spectrum Scale Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000."
  • "The price of Portworx Enterprise is high."
  • "It has two offerings. One is free, which is limited to only five nodes. The other is enterprise, which is a bit pricier."
  • "The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM."
  • More Portworx Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Software Defined Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:A custom IBM script is designed to tackle the storage management challenges within containerized environments, providing crucial data services and features required for enterprise applications.
    Top Answer:The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM.
    Top Answer:It would be highly advantageous to include an integrated backup solution within the same license, rather than purchasing backup separately. It would ensure a comprehensive and streamlined approach to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    551
    Comparisons
    451
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    202
    Rating
    9.5
    Views
    703
    Comparisons
    508
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    523
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    IBM Spectrum Scale is a cluster file system that provides concurrent access to a single file system or set of file systems from multiple nodes. The nodes can be SAN attached, network attached, a mixture of SAN attached and network attached, or in a shared nothing cluster configuration. This enables access to this common set of data to support a scale-out solution or to provide a high availability platform. IBM Spectrum Scale has many features beyond common data access including data replication, policy based storage management, and multi-site operations. You can create a cluster of AIX nodes, Linux nodes, Windows server nodes, or a mix of all three. IBM Spectrum Scale can run on virtualized instances providing common data access in environments, leverage logical partitioning, or other hypervisors. Multiple IBM Spectrum Scale clusters can share data within a location or across wide area network (WAN) connections.

    Portworx is the solution for running stateful containers in production, designed with DevOps in mind. With Portworx, users can manage any database or stateful service on any infrastructure using any container scheduler, including Kubernetes, Mesosphere DC/OS, and Docker Swarm. Portworx solves the five most common problems DevOps teams encounter when running stateful services in production: persistence, high availability, data automation, security, and support for multiple data stores and infrastructure.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm63%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Portworx Enterprise
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Portworx Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Spectrum Scale is ranked 3rd in Cloud Software Defined Storage with 10 reviews while Portworx Enterprise is ranked 2nd in Cloud Software Defined Storage with 6 reviews. IBM Spectrum Scale is rated 8.4, while Portworx Enterprise is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Scale writes "A stable solution with valuable profile-sharing features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portworx Enterprise writes "A solution backed by strong customer support, that is stable and scalable". IBM Spectrum Scale is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, DDN IME, VMware vSAN, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and IBM Cloud Object Storage, whereas Portworx Enterprise is most compared with Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation, Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and Robin Cloud Native Storage for Kubernetes. See our IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Portworx Enterprise report.

    See our list of best Cloud Software Defined Storage vendors and best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Software Defined Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.