IBM SSD vs Marvell comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
49 views|36 comparisons
Marvell Logo
97 views|68 comparisons
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution is very easy to use.
Top Answer:The product is cheaper than other products at the same level.
Top Answer:The solution is a bit old. The vendor is planning to modernize the interface. If it gets a facelift, it would be a stunning product because the backend is so powerful. It is very well developed. It… more »
Ranking
8th
out of 11 in SSD
Views
49
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
out of 11 in SSD
Views
97
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
IBM solid-state storage is affordable with innovative architectures, system and application integration, and management tools that:
  • Improve performance for hard-to-tune, I/O bound applications. No code changes required.
  • Reduce energy use and floor space. Can be filled near 100% without performance degradation.
  • Enable faster access times and IOPS.
Marvell delivers complete SSD solutions that include system-on-chip (SoC), board design and firmware. Our SoCs are compatible with the latest generations of NAND and manufactured using 28nm process node technology making them optimized for small form factors providing low power, footprint, and cost.
Sample Customers
Benefit, Employment and Support Services Division, State of Hawaii, INTERSPORT
Carnegie Mellon University

IBM SSD is ranked 8th in SSD while Marvell is ranked 7th in SSD. IBM SSD is rated 0.0, while Marvell is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SSD is most compared with , whereas Marvell is most compared with Western Digital SSD.

See our list of best SSD vendors.

We monitor all SSD reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.