IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs NetApp V-Series [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
370 views|321 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
NetApp Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli CDP for Files and NetApp V-Series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery.
To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."
  • More IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    62nd
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    370
    Comparisons
    321
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Backup and Recovery
    Buyer's Guide
    Backup and Recovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli CDP for Files
    Learn More
    NetApp
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Continuous Data Protection for Files is a continuous backup software that protects your most important files. This real-time, continuous data protection solution for file servers and user endpoints automatically backs up your most critical files the moment they are saved.
    NetApp V-Series storage virtualization controllers provide leading data protection, data management, and storage efficiency for your existing EMC, HDS, HP, IBM, Fujitsu, and NetApp E-Series storage arrays. Reclaim 35% or more capacity and reduce what you must spend for new disk drives to handle data growth by using NetApp storage efficiency features such as deduplication, thin provisioning, and compression. Optimize your workload performance with our broad flash portfolio.
    Sample Customers
    Cyberian Data Protection
    City of Houston, Health Choice Network, SVC Bank, Plex Systems, Larsen & Toubro, IWD, JCVI
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Educational Organization8%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise72%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Backup and Recovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 62nd in Backup and Recovery while NetApp V-Series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while NetApp V-Series [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp V-Series [EOL] writes "Connects third-party storage to back end with all NetApp functionalities available". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Commvault Cloud, IBM Spectrum Protect, Arcserve UDP and OpenText Data Protector, whereas NetApp V-Series [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.