Compare Idaptive vs. Ilex Sign&go

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Idaptive Logo
1,333 views|953 comparisons
Ilex Sign&go Logo
324 views|269 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, LogMeIn, Keeper and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: February 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory.""The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

More Idaptive Pros »

"The on-premises deployment meets restrictions and the end-user is able to control all the configuration in their own IT environment."

More Ilex Sign&go Pros »

Cons
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices.""They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

More Idaptive Cons »

"There is no software as a service or PaaS (Platform as a Service) offering from Ilex. The only option is on-premises integration."

More Ilex Sign&go Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

More Idaptive Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
Views
1,333
Comparisons
953
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
298
Rating
9.0
13th
Views
324
Comparisons
269
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,015
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Centrify Application Services
Sign&go
Learn More
Overview

Idaptive delivers Next-Gen Access, protecting organizations through a zero trust approach. With Idaptive, organizations secure access everywhere, reduce complexity and have newfound confidence to adopt modern business models and deliver awesome customer experiences.

Sign&go is a modular global SSO solution from llex International which addresses the security and traceability issues. It offers Strong authentication, Web Access Management, Mobile Access Management, Identity Federation functionalities through common architecture and administration.

Offer
Learn more about Idaptive
Learn more about Ilex Sign&go
Sample Customers
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
High Council of French Notaries, Leroy Merlin, IFP School, CANAL+ Group, Soci_t_ G_n_rale, Saint-ótienne University Hospital
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Government7%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, LogMeIn, Keeper and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: February 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Idaptive is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Ilex Sign&go is ranked 13th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review. Idaptive is rated 9.0, while Ilex Sign&go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Idaptive writes "A stable solution for accessing on-premises active directory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ilex Sign&go writes "Strong single sign on security comes packaged with simplicity in this on-premises-only solution". Idaptive is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Intune, SailPoint IdentityNow and Symantec Siteminder, whereas Ilex Sign&go is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.