We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."It is very easy to scale the product."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
Earn 20 points
Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC) while Ivanti NAC is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
