Infor Risk and Compliance vs Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infor Risk and Compliance and Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
38th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
145
Comparisons
104
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In GRC
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Infor Approva, Approva
Learn More
Overview
Infor Risk and Compliance (Approva) version 10 provides powerful controls monitoring to discover exceptions and violations across key enterprise applications. It offers improved performance, an intuitive user experience, enhanced reporting, and new analytic dashboards to improve visibility into risks. It supports Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition as its database and reporting server. It has enhanced extraction performance and enriched fuzzy logic algorithms, along with advanced data analysis, and reporting to quickly screen exceptions, identify violations and ultimately minimize exposure to risk.
Oracle Adaptive Access Manager helps organizations prevent fraud and misuse by strengthening existing authentication flows, evaluating the risk of events as they happen and providing risk-based interdiction mechanisms such as multi-factor out-of-band authentication. Intuitive policy administration and standardized integrations with the Identity and Access Management Suite components makes Oracle Adaptive Access Manager uniquely flexible and effective at reducing an enterprise's security exposure. Oracle Adaptive Access Manager provides real-time and batch risk analytics to combat fraud and misuse across multiple channels of access. It automates reviews of access and transaction events to detect fraud and misuse resulting in saved time and money, a proven capabilities and quick return on investment.
Sample Customers
Parkland Health, Denver Public Schools, LL Bean, SEB Group, Hansa Hydrocarbons, World Vision
Department of Conservation, New Zealand, Sudhir Power Ltd., Joyo Bank Ltd., Boxfusion, Mitsubishi Corporation, Saga d.o.o. Beograd, Asia Commercial Bank, Taikang Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Yapi Kredi Bank, Overhead Door Corporation, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm16%
Educational Organization9%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise56%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Infor Risk and Compliance is ranked 38th in GRC while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in GRC. Infor Risk and Compliance is rated 0.0, while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Infor Risk and Compliance is most compared with , whereas Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.