• Home
  • Infor Risk and Compliance vs. RSA Federated Identity Manager [EOL]

Infor Risk and Compliance vs RSA Federated Identity Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infor Risk and Compliance and RSA Federated Identity Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
38th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
145
Comparisons
104
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In GRC
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Infor Approva, Approva
Federated Identity Manager
Learn More
Infor
RSA
Overview
Infor Risk and Compliance (Approva) version 10 provides powerful controls monitoring to discover exceptions and violations across key enterprise applications. It offers improved performance, an intuitive user experience, enhanced reporting, and new analytic dashboards to improve visibility into risks. It supports Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition as its database and reporting server. It has enhanced extraction performance and enriched fuzzy logic algorithms, along with advanced data analysis, and reporting to quickly screen exceptions, identify violations and ultimately minimize exposure to risk.

RSA Federated Identity Manager enables end users to collaborate with partners, service providers, and multiple offices or agencies—all with a single identity and logon. Federated Identity Manager is based on Web services standards including OASIS Web Services Federation (WSFED), Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), and Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML 1.1 and 2.0). It can be used to easily integrate, configure, and obtain more options for securely federating both employee and consumer identities.

Sample Customers
Parkland Health, Denver Public Schools, LL Bean, SEB Group, Hansa Hydrocarbons, World Vision
French National Ministry of Education
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm16%
Educational Organization9%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise56%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Infor Risk and Compliance is ranked 38th in GRC while RSA Federated Identity Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in GRC. Infor Risk and Compliance is rated 0.0, while RSA Federated Identity Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Infor Risk and Compliance is most compared with , whereas RSA Federated Identity Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.