We performed a comparison between Informatica PowerCenter and Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The interface is very clean and clear."
"It's a very powerful tool you can use to load data, get data, do the drawing between the tables, and put into the packet in a very fast way."
"It is very comprehensive in terms of connector and transformation capabilities from both a source and target perspective."
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is very user-friendly and the graphical design is very easy to understand."
"Good product if you are trying implement data quality, data integration, and data management projects."
"The solution is stable."
"What I like the most is that we have to deal with less while writing the queries."
"Among all the solutions I have used, I found Informatica PowerCenter to be much more stable in terms of application."
"OpenAPI supported me integrating Oracle Warehouse Builder with DevOps solutions like versioning (CVS, Subversion, and Git), ticket systems (Bugzilla and Jira), and test automatization (HPQC) as well as with professional ALM solutions (HP ALM and IKAN ALM)."
"Now they are migrating to a new version, and they have something that is called Informatica Developer. Previously, they just had PowerCenter. Now, when they move everything to Informatica Developer it's not as good or stable like it was when it was PowerCenter, though it has some nice features. This Developer tool could be better."
"Informatica, in my opinion, is very rigid and not very flexible, whereas platforms like Alteryx or Matillion are very flexible and agile."
"Compared to solutions offering similar functionalities, Informatica PowerCenter is not very flexible regarding customized integrations."
"The licensing cost for Informatica is very high. Other all-in-one solutions have much lower prices than Informatica."
"This product is going to decommission in the next couple of years."
"Lacks ability to calculate cost of the product."
"Integration with Artificial Intelligence would benefit this solution."
"The solution must improve the integration with new services."
"Unfortunately, a next release of Oracle Warehouse Builder will not happen but a wide range of customers still use the available features together with the current Oracle 11g or 12c database environments."
More Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 3rd in Data Integration with 78 reviews while Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration. Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0, while Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] writes "Can be enhanced with extra functionality, but no further support will be given for the solution". Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue, whereas Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.