We performed a comparison between Informatica Supplier 360 and SAS MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software."It's got a reputation in the industry as one of the best solutions for master data management. So, it's what we see in the Gartner top right quadrant as the best product in that space."
"One good feature is that SAS MDM comes bundled with the entire stack so we are in a position to place it with the client. So when a client wants an analytics tool plus BI, and they want to bring in other elements, that is when we look to MDM, because it is a single vendor."
"We'd like to see the microservices, which don't run yet because the solution is not yet fully cloud-based."
"The initial setup was slightly complex. We did face a couple of issues such as the SAML integration not being very smooth. And linking communication with the metadata server was a bit of a challenge. Eventually, we were able to configure it properly."
Earn 20 points
Informatica Supplier 360 is ranked 12th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 1 review while SAS MDM is ranked 16th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software. Informatica Supplier 360 is rated 8.0, while SAS MDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Supplier 360 writes "A Reasonable Number of Products with No Restrictions on Specific Parts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS MDM writes "When a client wants an analytics tool plus BI, that is when we look to this solution". Informatica Supplier 360 is most compared with Informatica MDM and Informatica PIM, whereas SAS MDM is most compared with Informatica MDM, Profisee, Microsoft MDS and IBM Master Data Management on Cloud.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
