• Home
  • ISC Software JCL Checker vs. NMQA QABook

ISC Software JCL Checker vs NMQA QABook comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
6th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
28
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
17
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
QABook
Learn More
ISC Software
Video Not Available
NMQA
Video Not Available
Overview

JCL Checker is the ideal JCL validation tool. It ensures the optimal use of your production department’s time and resources by providing early detection of all JCL-related problems. The software efficiently checks JCL for syntax errors, and reports everything from missing data sets to program existence long before the code is submitted for execution.

The solution has powerful, high-speed capabilities that easily automate the JCL verification process. It helps ensure correctly formatted JCL. It also enforces in-house norms and standards with minimal wasted effort on the part of your IT team.

Test management product that is offered on premises or in the cloud via desktop, Microsoft SharePoint, or the web.
Sample Customers
DCNS, Pictet, Airbus Helicopters, Achema, AG2R Mondiale, GRZ, Credit Agricole, GMF, Societe Generale, Matmut, Generali, Pole Emploi, BNP Paribas
Capgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI

ISC Software JCL Checker is ranked 6th in Defect Tracking while NMQA QABook is ranked 7th in Defect Tracking. ISC Software JCL Checker is rated 0.0, while NMQA QABook is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ISC Software JCL Checker is most compared with , whereas NMQA QABook is most compared with .

See our list of best Defect Tracking vendors.

We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.