Compare Isis Papyrus Customer Communications vs. THREADS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
11th
out of 21 in CCM
Views
465
Comparisons
285
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
21st
out of 21 in CCM
Views
4
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Papyrus Customer Communications Platform, Isis Papyrus CCM, Papyrus CCM
Learn
Isis
THREADS
Video Not Available
Overview

Isis Papyrus Customer Communication Platform enables corporations to consolidate all types of document output (high-volume batch, online, user interactive and on-demand) on one platform. All generated building blocks (data, text, tables, images, etc.) can be reused across all document types. Corporate design and identity is guaranteed. Business teams are empowered by the Papyrus Correspondence Framework Solution to generate content and assemble complete mailings. IT works in collaboration with the business teams sharing data, content, document building blocks and resources from a common central WebRepository.

Threads empowers teams to easily share, discuss, and make decisions no matter where they are.

Offer
Learn more about Isis Papyrus Customer Communications
Learn more about THREADS
Sample Customers
Union Investment, Cyta, NFU Mutual, BNP Paribas (Suisse) SA, Raiffeisen Group Austria, RheinLand Insurance Group, Chinatrust Commercial Bank, Gebªhren Info Service GmbH (GIS), National Savings and Investments (NS&I), PaneonBUFFER, BREX, The Atlantic, Whisper, Bitwise, Aspire
Isis Papyrus Customer Communications is ranked 11th in CCM while THREADS is ranked 21st in CCM. Isis Papyrus Customer Communications is rated 0.0, while THREADS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Isis Papyrus Customer Communications is most compared with Quadient Inspire, OpenText Exstream, Smart Communications and OpenText Document Sciences xPression, whereas THREADS is most compared with .

See our list of best CCM vendors.

We monitor all CCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.