"The Forward Thinking scenario modeling is the most valuable feature. Using the tool, we've been able to model new demands on our systems and identify where bottlenecks will occur. We've been able to proactively address those issues and fix them before they become service-affecting."
"It helps to plan how you can scale up your environment, and it gives an overview of your entire infra."
"Easy access to resources of our cloud."
"There is room for improvement on the reporting side of the product. The reports are perfectly serviceable and they give us the information that we need, but they can be a bit old-fashioned to look at. ITRS has acknowledged this — we've got a good relationship with them — and they're looking to make improvements and move more to real-time dashboards."
"It should have more reporting features. It will help in getting more reporting information."
"It needs to improve the capacity planning."
ITRS Capacity Planner is ranked 5th in Infrastructure Capacity Planning while OpenText Cloud Optimizer is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure Capacity Planning. ITRS Capacity Planner is rated 9.0, while OpenText Cloud Optimizer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ITRS Capacity Planner writes "Using the machine-learning alerts has helped us catch errors before they become service-affecting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Optimizer writes "Gives an overview of the entire infrastructure and helps with the optimization and capacity planning". ITRS Capacity Planner is most compared with BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization, whereas OpenText Cloud Optimizer is most compared with BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization.
See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
