Compare Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs. OWASP Zap

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,854 views|37,366 comparisons
Ixia BreakingPoint VE Logo
430 views|242 comparisons
OWASP Zap Logo
29,903 views|20,853 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Ixia BreakingPoint VE? Share your opinion.
Balaji Senthiappan
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use.""OWASP Zap is free to use.""This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing.""This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge."

More OWASP Zap Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: por ahora estoy usando Owasp Zap, es muy intuitivo y sus reportes muy detallados, probe con burp suite pero no me… more »
Top Answer: Automatic updates and pull request analysis.
Top Answer: The product is somewhat complicated and could be improved by simplifying it because you don't want to have to allocate… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 64% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Learn
Veracode
Ixia
OWASP
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Ixia’s BreakingPoint virtual edition (VE) provides scalable real-world application and threat simulation in a deployment model that fits IT budgets by leveraging virtualization and industry-standard hardware platforms.

  • Seamless transition between hardware and virtual platforms enables easy translation of functional and performace testing in physical or virtual environments
  • Common licensing server shared among BreakingPoint VE, IxLoad VE, and IxNetwork VE
  • BreakingPoint supports all major Hypervisors allowing deployment in a wide variety of VM enviroments
  • Subscription based licensing model comes an all-inclusive license that reduces startup cost
  • Bi-monthly Application and Threat Intelligence (ATI) subscription updates ensure you are current with the latest applications and threats

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a free, open-source penetration testing tool being maintained under the umbrella of the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). ZAP is designed specifically for testing web applications and is both flexible and extensible.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Ixia BreakingPoint VE
Learn more about OWASP Zap
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerCorsa Technology
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Engineering Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Retailer13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company7%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise59%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ixia BreakingPoint VE is ranked 26th in Application Security Testing (AST) while OWASP Zap is ranked 6th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 9 reviews. Ixia BreakingPoint VE is rated 0.0, while OWASP Zap is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OWASP Zap writes "Inexpensive licensing, free to use, and has good community support". Ixia BreakingPoint VE is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood, whereas OWASP Zap is most compared with PortSwigger Burp, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Fortify WebInspect and HCL AppScan.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.