Ixia BreakingPoint vs. OWASP Zap

As of June 2019, Ixia BreakingPoint is ranked 14th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews vs OWASP Zap which is ranked 5th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 9 reviews. The top reviewer of Ixia BreakingPoint writes "Enables us to generate traffic but the quality of the traffic generation should and will be improved". The top reviewer of OWASP Zap writes "Inexpensive licensing, free to use, and has good community support". Ixia BreakingPoint is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood, Codenomicon Defensics and Appvance IQ. OWASP Zap is most compared with PortSwigger Burp, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner and IBM Security AppScan. See our Ixia BreakingPoint vs. OWASP Zap report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ixia BreakingPoint Logo
1,782 views|613 comparisons
OWASP Zap Logo
22,201 views|14,892 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia BreakingPoint vs. OWASP Zap and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
347,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like.The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use.

Read more »

The OWASP's tool is free of cost, which gives it a great advantage, especially for smaller companies to make use of the tool.This solution has improved my organization because it has made us feel safer doing frequent deployments for web applications. If we have something really big, we might get some professional company in to help us but if we're releasing small products, we will check it ourselves with Zap. It makes it easier and safer.It can be used effectively for internal auditing.The community edition updates services regularly. They add new vulnerabilities into the scanning list.It scans while you navigate, then you can save the requests performed and work with them later.Fuzzer and Java APIs help a lot with our custom needs.​It has improved my organization with faster security tests.​The vulnerabilities that it finds, because the primary goal is to secure applications and websites.

Read more »

Cons
The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do.I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks.

Read more »

There's very little documentation that comes with OWASP Zap.If there was an easier to understand exactly what has been checked and what has not been checked, it would make this solution better. We have to trust that it has checked all known vulnerabilities but it's a bit hard to see after the scanning.It needs more robust reporting tools.As security evolves, we would like DevOps built into it. As of now, Zap does not provide this.I would like to see a version of “repeater” within OWASP ZAP, a tool capable of sending from one to 1000 of the same requests, but with preselected modified fields, changing from a predetermined word ​list, or manually created.It would be nice to have a solid SQL injection engine built into Zap.The port scanner is a little too slow.​It doesn't run on absolutely every operating system.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that.

Read more »

OWASP Zap is free to use.It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use.OWASP ZAP is a free tool provided by OWASP’s engineers and experts. There is an option to donate.As Zap is free and open-source, with tons of features similar to those of commercial solutions, I would definitely recommend trying it out.It's free and open, currently under the Apache 2 license. If ZAP does what you need it to do, selling a free solution is a very easy.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
347,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,782
Comparisons
613
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
612
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
22,201
Comparisons
14,892
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
412
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 65% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Learn
Ixia
OWASP
Overview

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a free, open-source penetration testing tool being maintained under the umbrella of the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). ZAP is designed specifically for testing web applications and is both flexible and extensible.

Offer
Learn more about Ixia BreakingPoint
Learn more about OWASP Zap
Sample Customers
Corsa Technology
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia BreakingPoint vs. OWASP Zap and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
347,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email