We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SYSPRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"A stable and solid product."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The solution is stable."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."
Earn 20 points
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SYSPRO is ranked 28th in ERP. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SYSPRO is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SYSPRO writes "A great choice for straight manufacturing, but not suitable for complex manufacturing models". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA, whereas SYSPRO is most compared with SAP ERP, Epicor ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.