Compare JumpMind SymmetricDS vs. OpenText Contivo
Ranking  | |
Views 2,109 Comparisons 1,765 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 5 Comparisons 3 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
 Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: December 2020. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 27% of the time.  Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| SymmetricDS | Contivo |
Learn | |
| JumpMind | OpenText |
Overview | |
| Open source software for Data Replication, Change Data Capture, and Data Transformation in a heterogeneous enterprise environment. | OpenText Contivo helps enterprise integration teams become more efficient and agile |
Offer | |
Learn more about JumpMind SymmetricDS | Learn more about OpenText Contivo |
Sample Customers | |
| SmartMD, Cancer Research UK | Information Not Available |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company30% Comms Service Provider10% Media Company9% Non Profit9% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: December 2020.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JumpMind SymmetricDS is ranked 6th in Data Replication while OpenText Contivo is ranked 83rd in Data Integration Tools. JumpMind SymmetricDS is rated 0.0, while OpenText Contivo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, JumpMind SymmetricDS is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, DBSync Cloud Workflow, SSIS, Talend Open Studio and AWS Database Migration Service, whereas OpenText Contivo is most compared with .
See our list of .
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.