We compared Juniper MX Series Routers and Netgate TNSR across several parameters based on our user reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: The reviews for Juniper MX Series Routers indicate varying durations for deployment, ranging from a week to three months. Setup may also take an additional week. Netgate TNSR reviews mention both a week for deployment and setup, as well as three months for deployment and an extra week for setup.
Valuable Features: Juniper MX Series Routers are praised for their excellent scalability, seamless integration with other devices, and reliable network connectivity. Netgate TNSR stands out with its robust security measures and exceptional scalability, allowing for effortless expansion and adaptation.
Room For Improvement: The Juniper MX Series Routers could benefit from improvements in firmware updates, interface stability, software bugs, documentation clarity, and technical support availability. Users suggest that Netgate TNSR could enhance user-friendliness, configuration processes, documentation and support resources, performance, and stability.
Setup Cost: The setup cost of Juniper MX Series Routers can vary depending on network requirements, while the setup cost of Netgate TNSR is straightforward and not overly complicated. The licensing process for Juniper is described as straightforward and efficient, while Netgate offers flexibility and options to choose from.
ROI: The Juniper MX Series Routers have shown high user satisfaction, with significant cost savings, improved productivity, reliability, performance, and advanced features. Users experienced a positive impact on their business operations and efficiency. In comparison, users of Netgate TNSR have reported positive returns on investment, finding value and profitability in the product.
Customer Service: Juniper support is praised for its prompt and knowledgeable responses, effective troubleshooting, and problem-solving capabilities. Netgate is highly praised for its excellent assistance and reliable and supportive customer service.
Juniper MX Series Routers are preferred over Netgate TNSR due to user feedback highlighting its seamless integration with other devices, excellent scalability, and advanced security features. Users also appreciate the prompt and knowledgeable customer service provided. Juniper MX Series Routers offer a more robust hardware design and efficient network connectivity and have received highly satisfactory ROI from users. Netgate TNSR, on the other hand, requires enhancements in terms of user interface design, configuration, setup processes, documentation, troubleshooting resources, and performance and stability.
"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."
"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."
"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"I have found the most useful features to be layered VPNs, IPsec, VPLS, and firewall filters."
"Juniper Switches is stable, easy to use, flexible, and has good performance. Also, the technology is good. It has a lifetime warranty and the prices are also very good."
"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"There is room for improvement in pricing. The product could be cheaper for smaller networks."
"The solution could improve reliability and it needs more functions."
"It is not scalable, unfortunately."
"The web interface can be improved."
"Juniper have addressed issues with the MX204, but it still has a limited number of interfaces. Ideally, it should support up to twenty or twenty-four interfaces to better serve smaller service providers. Additionally, the MX304 doesn't support subscriber management, also known as BNG, which I believe should be included."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."
"The only thing that might need improvement would be the occasional downtime."
"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews while Netgate TNSR is ranked 8th in Routers with 2 reviews. Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8, while Netgate TNSR is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netgate TNSR writes "Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing". Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and ExtremeRouting, whereas Netgate TNSR is most compared with MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, Cisco Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Routers and Switches.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.