Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Security for Mail Server and Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Barracuda Networks, IRONSCALES and others in Secure Email Gateway (SEG).
To learn more, read our detailed Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Aziz Moha
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can install the plugins on the same machine hosting your exchange solution. It's a good complement for Sophos security, which scans the traffic before it reaches your mail service. Kaspersky is on the mail server itself while Sophos handles the incoming traffic. With both of them working together, we have the perfect solution for mail.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution.""The most valuable features are the anti-phishing and anti-spam capabilities.""The most valuable feature is the straightforward setup.""The integration rate is very high in Kaspersky, which is why most of our customers like it."

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Pros →

"They do a better job of determining what's real and what's not than most of the other solutions we have tried, and it's been very painless to use."

More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Pros →

Cons
"Kaspersky lacks in the area of customization, so simpler customization options need to be provided to users.""The solution is not 100 percent stable and that can use improvement.""It would be great if Kaspersky could do what Sophos does for us. However, we love having these two different technologies doing the same thing. Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't.""The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license.""Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on."

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Cons →

"They have some areas that could be improved. For example, we also use this solution for email encryption, which was clunky and could be improved, but the email security itself has been excellent."

More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Price-wise, I would rate this product a four out of five. It could be a bit cheaper."
  • "The solution is not expensive."
  • "The solution offers one of the best prices possible to its users, making it even better than Barracuda. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ten times cheaper than Barracuda."
  • "My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution."
  • More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In terms of pricing, I believe they provide excellent value."
  • More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution.
    Top Answer:My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution.
    Top Answer:The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license. The license renewal is an area that needs… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    305
    Comparisons
    239
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    220
    Comparisons
    163
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Zix Email Encryption, ZixEncrypt
    Learn More
    Overview

    Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

    Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

    Proven Content Filters

    To send an encrypted email, your employees simply create a message and hit ‘send'. Our content filters take care of the rest.

    Transparent Delivery

    When your employees receive an encrypted reply, the experience is just as easy. They simply open the encrypted email like regular email. No matter where they are or what device they use, if your customers and partners have email, they can easily receive encrypted email.

    Convenient Recipient Experience

    Our patented Best Method of Delivery ensures all messages are delivered in the most secure and easy manner possible, including transparent, pull and push methods. For pull delivery, secure web portals can be in the cloud or on-site. Also among our robust methods is secure PDF for statement delivery.

    Simplified Quarantined Messages

    If an email is quarantined, then employees, managers and IT receive notification to view the message and policy violations and can delete the email, or justify and release it for delivery.

    Sample Customers
    Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher
    Erie County of Pennsylvania’s Human Services Department, Justice Federal Credit Union, STAR Financial Group, Chisago County, Minn., The National Banks of Central Texas, Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS), Frankfort, Ky, Athletico Physical Therapy, District of Columbia Retirement Board (DCRB), CIBM Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    University10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Secure Email Gateway (SEG)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Barracuda Networks, IRONSCALES and others in Secure Email Gateway (SEG). Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ranked 10th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 5 reviews while Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix is ranked 13th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG). Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is rated 8.2, while Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server writes "A stable product that offers a very high rate of integration to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix writes "Inexpensive, with good email security, but the technical support could be improved". Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is most compared with Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Fortinet FortiMail, Cisco Secure Email, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP).

    See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

    We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.