We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and TestProject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy for a non-technical person to use and adopt."
"It has been good so far for API testing on Mac. It is not that hard to learn and use. There is so much support out there, so if anyone wants to start using it, there is enough help."
"The scalability of the product is good."
"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"The tool is easy to use. The product gives me the flexibility to use Selenium. I can also use my Java capabilities in the solution."
"Video capture on failure is a must have. A picture is worth a thousand words. A video is worth a thousand pictures (literally)."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"The basic framework and project organization is very good."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"Katalon doesn't support testing of hybrid applications. It's a limitation."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"The product is comparatively slow."
"Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area."
"It is difficult to identify elements on websites that use Angular or ReactJS because they don't have an option to view source code."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 41 reviews while TestProject is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while TestProject is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Testsigma, whereas TestProject is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Testim. See our Katalon Studio vs. TestProject report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
