Compare Kroll Ontrack Verve vs. Xerox CategoriX

Kroll Ontrack Verve is ranked 23rd in eDiscovery while Xerox CategoriX is ranked 30th in eDiscovery. Kroll Ontrack Verve is rated 0, while Xerox CategoriX is rated 0. On the other hand, Kroll Ontrack Verve is most compared with Guidance Software EnCase, whereas Xerox CategoriX is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kroll Ontrack Verve Logo
111 views|79 comparisons
Xerox CategoriX Logo
59 views|41 comparisons
Ranking
23rd
out of 44 in eDiscovery
Views
111
Comparisons
79
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
30th
out of 44 in eDiscovery
Views
59
Comparisons
41
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
VerveCategoriX
Learn
Kroll Ontrack
Xerox
Overview
Verve helps engage Customers, Employees and Partners to enable interactions that drive innovationXerox CategoriX proprietary automated document classification technology that dramatically improves the speed, accuracy and consistency of litigation review.The tool also detects when two similar documents appear in different categories, prompting the legal team to take a closer look to ensure consistency. CategoriX leverages the expertise of attorneys and subject matter experts most knowledgeable about the case early in the process, and applies statistical and machine-learning techniques to calculate graduated relevance scores for each document in the collection. CategoriX combines powerful technology with human expertise to deliver a high-quality document review there is no need to install or maintain software, scale servers, train IT personnel or end users, or staff technical experts in-house.
Offer
Learn more about Kroll Ontrack Verve
Learn more about Xerox CategoriX
Sample Customers
Micron, HPHertz
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.