• Home
  • LanceDB vs. Qdrant

LanceDB vs Qdrant comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LanceDB Logo

LanceDB

Read 1 LanceDB review
228 views|199 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Qdrant Logo

Qdrant

310 views|305 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Open Source Databases
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LanceDB and Qdrant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed Open Source Databases Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Arucy Lionel
A simple solution that has very good documentation and low research consumption
LanceDB has improved our organization. Originally, I used RediSearch, which was complex because the app had to call an external service. Since... Read more →
Use Qdrant?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am using the community edition of LanceDB, which is very cheap."

    • More LanceDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about LanceDB?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of LanceDB is its simplicity.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LanceDB?
    Top Answer:I am using the community edition of LanceDB, which is very cheap.
    What is your primary use case for LanceDB?
    Top Answer:I use LanceDB for intent detection for the bot and for managing the knowledge base. When you upload a bunch of text to the bot, it will use that to know what to say when the user presents a request.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 18 in Open Source Databases
    Views
    228
    Comparisons
    199
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    387
    Rating
    9.0
    15th
    out of 18 in Open Source Databases
    Views
    310
    Comparisons
    305
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Chroma logo
    Chroma vs. LanceDB
    Compared 57% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Milvus vs. LanceDB
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Pinecone vs. LanceDB
    Compared 6% of the time.
    PostgreSQL logo
    PostgreSQL vs. LanceDB
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Redis logo
    Redis vs. LanceDB
    Compared 2% of the time.
    More LanceDB Competitors   →
    Faiss logo
    Faiss vs. Qdrant
    Compared 28% of the time.
    Chroma logo
    Chroma vs. Qdrant
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Pinecone vs. Qdrant
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Elastic Search logo
    Elastic Search vs. Qdrant
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Weaviate logo
    Weaviate vs. Qdrant
    Compared 8% of the time.
    More Qdrant Competitors   →
    Learn More
    LanceDB
    Qdrant
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Zero management overhead, developer-friendly and open source. LanceDB is lightweight, scales from development to production and is 100x cheaper than alternatives.

    Qdrant is a powerful tool for efficiently organizing and searching large volumes of data. It is particularly useful for tasks such as data indexing, similarity search, and recommendation systems. 

    With fast and accurate results, it is suitable for various applications including e-commerce, content management, and data analysis. Users appreciate Qdrant's efficient search capabilities, high performance, and ease of use. 

    Its quick and accurate retrieval of relevant information allows for easy navigation and analysis of large datasets. 

    The intuitive interface and straightforward setup process make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. BMW 5.Cisco 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. Disney 9. Google 10. HP 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Heinz 15. L'Oreal 16. McDonalds 17. Merck 18. Microsoft 19. Nike20. Oracle 21. PG 22. PepsiCo 23. Procter and Gamble 24. Samsung 25. Shell 26. Sony 27. Toyota 28. Visa 29. Walmart 30. WeWork
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University10%
    Legal Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization8%
    University8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Open Source Databases
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    LanceDB is ranked 10th in Open Source Databases with 1 review while Qdrant is ranked 15th in Open Source Databases. LanceDB is rated 9.0, while Qdrant is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of LanceDB writes "A simple solution that has very good documentation and low research consumption". On the other hand, LanceDB is most compared with Chroma, Milvus, Pinecone, PostgreSQL and Redis, whereas Qdrant is most compared with Faiss, Chroma, Pinecone, Elastic Search and Weaviate.

    See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors and best Vector Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.