LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager [EOL] vs RF Code CenterScape comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager [EOL] and RF Code CenterScape based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Asset Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In IT Asset Management
32nd
out of 48 in IT Asset Management
Views
101
Comparisons
74
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
IT Asset Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Asset Lifecycle Manager
Learn More
Overview

Imagine software compliance, license entitlement, software and hardware discovery, asset lifecycle management, and financial management—all integrated into a single solution. With the IT Asset Management (ITAM) Suite you can visualize your ROI through a clean, business-value interface.

The solution enables you to know what assets you have, where they are, how they’re used, and how they’re performing for better decisions at any stage of an asset’s lifecycle. You can reduce software overspend and eliminate unnecessary and redundant licenses. Plus you can implement automated processes to improve efficiencies and reveal more usable data on-demand.

With features not found in any other data center management software, CenterScape is a complete, end-to-end solution for real-time asset management and environmental monitoring, combining powerful functionality with an intuitive, easy-to-use console to drive data center efficiency, reliability, and savings. When deployed with RF Code’s IoT instrumentation layer, CenterScape continuously tracks physical asset locations and environmental conditions in real-time, allowing you to easily locate and manage equipment, identify and troubleshoot power and cooling inefficiencies, and avoid costly downtime. Automated alerts and reports can be configured for immediate notification of asset location or environmental condition changes. Reporting, graphing and 3D visualization are available at the touch of a button. And CenterScape’s database schema can be easily edited and customized, ensuring that your data is specifically suited to the needs of your business. With complete, automated lifecycle management, CenterScape makes it simple to manage your assets from arrival through deployment to decommissioning. By managing current and historical asset attributes such as financial data, physical location, and environmental conditions, CenterScape eliminates costly and inaccurate manual processes and reduces your total cost of ownership.
Sample Customers
MBDA, 21st Century Oncology, Adams 12 Five Star Schools District, TUI InfoTec, Troika Dialog, US County Government
IBM, Dell, Vodafone, CenturyLink, CME Group, Wells Fargo, Bloomberg. Data Foundry, Equinix, Fedex, HP
Buyer's Guide
IT Asset Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while RF Code CenterScape is ranked 32nd in IT Asset Management. LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0, while RF Code CenterScape is rated 0.0. On the other hand, LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RF Code CenterScape is most compared with ServiceNow.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.