• Home
  • LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] vs. Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]

LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] vs Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] and Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Server Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL]?
William Linn
It has a limit on the number of systems that can be managed but it is proactive in heading off failures.
It is proactive in heading off failures that would be catastrophic to the business.
Ranking
Unranked
In Server Monitoring
Unranked
In Server Monitoring
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Systems Lifecycle Management
HPE BTO, HPE Business Technology Optimization, HPE OpenView
Learn More
Ivanti
OpenText
Video Not Available
Overview

Modernize your IT, satisfy growing user expectations, and manage all the devices users carry from a single, unified endpoint management solution. Update how you deliver applications to users through automated rollout projects and a self-service app store experience. LANDESK Management Suite is proven, reliable client management software that integrates with multiple IT solutions. You gain greater visibility into what devices you have and boost IT and user productivity.

The Micro Focus OpenView Performance manager, agents, and monitor combine to provide a powerful and flexible distributed management solution. This solution is a single interface for centrally monitoring, analyzing, and forecasting resource utilization for distributed multivendor environments, enabling you to offer the best possible level of service in a cost-effective manner.

Sample Customers
MBDA, Admiral Group, 21st Century Oncology, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Christopher Newport University, Derbyshire Health Informatics Services, Cegedim Outsourcing, RuffaloCODY, Apollo-Optik
MTS India
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Server Monitoring while Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Server Monitoring. LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] writes "It has a limit on the number of systems that can be managed but it is proactive in heading off failures". LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.