Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Lucid Software Logo
7,641 views|6,848 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Miro Logo
19,971 views|18,750 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lucidspark and Miro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Visual Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In terms of the most valuable features, I like that we can compare a report to our templates. That is really useful. I saw that it has all of these templates that I can use. I also love that I can use my own images.""We have used this solution for remote or virtual brainstorming sessions. We're a 100% remote company and therefore having that capability is important.""The fact that you can have multiple users working at the same time is a really big plus. The fact that we can all collaborate in real-time is a very useful aspect.""The whole reason why I use Lucidspark and Lucidchart is because of the way that I collaborate with other people, e.g., if I send somebody a document that it is more difficult to use because I have to convert everything to a PDF. With Lucidspark, I can give them a link. They can open it up, then they can move things around. That is very helpful. That is one of the reasons why I like using it. It's kind of like Basecamp with art.""The solution enables me to prioritize ideas.""The whiteboard has been very helpful. It's a nice tool. At least for me, as a teacher, that's been very helpful and it's an easy tool. There are specific tools within the whiteboard for drawing. It makes things easier, so I like that.""The Whiteboard session feature could be the most helpful feature. It can help my organization through brainstorming and design sessions for technical tools, systems, and solutions. It's hard to brainstorm remotely and this tool will help to facilitate that.""I like the fact that Lucidspark has got all these templates that we can use."

More Lucidspark Pros →

"Online Collaboration made it easy to brainstorm.""Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful."

More Miro Pros →

Cons
"The only thing that is a little cumbersome for me is trying to use a mouse as a stylist somehow. I would like it if there was a different way to do that.""When two people are editing, there should be a way to lock the other person's changes to avoid having a person overwrite someone else's changes. When multiple users access the same document, there should be some way of locking others out, possibly by changing user permissions.""One thing I wish it had is, if I draw a square or a rectangle freehand, that it would actually just draw a nice rectangle; or similarly with a circle. Some sort of automatic shape recognition and formatting would be helpful.""Sometimes, editing text can be confusing. Changing different fonts and subtitles and the shapes that you're trying to use can be confusing. There isn't that much that I would improve other than just nitpicky user differences.""The challenge that I always face with a tool like this is how to convince other people to start trying it out. I can't say if Lucidspark does a better job than other such tools.""One of the things that I struggled with a little bit was navigating around the board. Because it's so big that when you want to find certain sections, it can be a little bit challenging to move the little box in the corner around to find where you are. If there could be more options to move around the board, that might make it easier. It can have a joystick version or something like that so that you could just manually move around, or there should be an option for a picture in the corner on which you click around to locate different items on the board.""One challenge we ran into while collaborating on Lucidspark was tracking time. We would, for example, set aside 90 minutes for a particular task but end up spending a lot more time on it. It would be great to see if Lucidspark could also help us keep track of time. That feedback would be beneficial.""One thing that I actually found difficult to do was to introduce video calls. Managing calls and the whiteboards and being all remote is difficult."

More Lucidspark Cons →

"Maybe at some point, Miro should be able to use AI to provide analysis from the brainstorming sessions or files fed into it.""It should have a desktop version."

More Miro Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is room for improvement in terms of the cost. It should all be bundled together. It's becoming like a Microsoft, where you have to buy all the different version features separately. It should just all be bundled with one price."
  • "The licensing is a fair price. We mainly have single users. We chose not to do the team user because of the cost. We didn't see a need for that at this point. We have talked to Lucidchart and Lucidspark salesmen often about that."
  • "It's a very reasonable $8 a month. That makes it really accessible and helps it fill a pretty significant need for virtual collaboration. Just about every leadership team member that I've talked to said, 'Oh, well, that's cheap, just go buy it.'"
  • "It is not cost-prohibitive. It is well worth it, but we are also a small team. We are definitely planning on having it as part of our onboarding for everyone, but I haven't looked at the pricing for an enterprise level or large set of employees."
  • "I personally had a hard time getting the licenses sorted out. In the organizational license, the whole process took a lot of time. Personally, I feel that the licensing could be done much better on that front."
  • "It would be better if I didn't use Lucidspark at all and just used Illustrator and Photoshop, but it doesn't make sense for my projects to do that. It would remove a tremendous amount of steps, but it would cost a tremendous amount of money."
  • "One must pay extra if he wishes to have a higher level product."
  • "I don't think that the cost is ever something that I considered. It has always been worth it to pay a small payment and help everyone with their tasks. It has definitely helped me become more organized. I don't think that the cost has been a barrier at all, and it is worth it to be able to pay for it."
  • More Lucidspark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating… more »
    Top Answer:Windows Server integrates well with all Microsoft and many other mainstream solutions Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than with other solutions. We really… more »
    Top Answer:Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful.
    Top Answer:The solution is super easy to set up.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,641
    Comparisons
    6,848
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,237
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    19,971
    Comparisons
    18,750
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    590
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Lucidchart logo
    Compared 75% of the time.
    Figma logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    MURAL logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Jamboard logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Figma logo
    Compared 96% of the time.
    Lucidchart logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Bluescape logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Asana logo
    Compared 0% of the time.
    iObeya logo
    Compared 0% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Lucidspark is a virtual whiteboard where teams can bring their best ideas to light. Collaborate in real time, no matter where you are. Lucidspark helps people organize notes and scribbles and turn them into presentation-ready concepts. When it’s time for next steps, teams can develop workflows and process documents to turn ideas into reality. Features include: integrations, infinite canvas, sticky notes, freehand drawing, chat, templates, timer, voting, and more.

    With Lucidspark, you can not only brainstorm ideas as a team but then refine and organize those ideas to drive action. Features like assisted grouping and Lucidchart import/export help users turn ideas into plans and strategies.

    Lucidspark is part of the Lucid suite, the only visual collaboration suite that helps teams see and build the future from idea to reality. Users can start ideating in Lucidspark and then seamlessly move to Lucidchart and Lucidchart Cloud Insights to complete the full project lifecycle and make their ideas a reality.

    Miro is a collaborative online whiteboard platform that enables teams to work together remotely, brainstorm ideas, and visualize concepts. With its intuitive interface and extensive range of features, Miro has become a popular tool for remote teams, designers, and educators.

    One of the key features of Miro is its vast library of templates and widgets, which allows users to quickly create various types of visual content such as mind maps, flowcharts, wireframes, and user journey maps. These templates provide a starting point for collaboration and help teams to structure their ideas effectively.

    Miro also offers real-time collaboration, allowing team members to work together on the same board simultaneously. Users can leave comments, mention team members, and have discussions directly on the board, eliminating the need for lengthy email threads or separate communication tools.

    The platform also integrates with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Google Drive, making it easy to import and export content from other applications. This seamless integration enhances productivity and ensures that teams can work with their preferred tools without any disruptions.

    Furthermore, Miro provides a range of interactive features that enhance collaboration and engagement. Users can add sticky notes, create voting sessions, and conduct remote workshops using Miro's built-in video conferencing capabilities. These features make it easy for teams to brainstorm ideas, gather feedback, and make decisions together, regardless of their physical location.

    In addition to its collaborative features, Miro also prioritizes security and privacy. The platform offers enterprise-grade security measures, including data encryption, access controls, and compliance with industry standards like GDPR and SOC 2. This ensures that sensitive information remains protected and confidential.

    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    University15%
    Renewables & Environment Company10%
    Media Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Visual Collaboration Platforms
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Lucidspark is ranked 4th in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 33 reviews while Miro is ranked 2nd in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews. Lucidspark is rated 8.6, while Miro is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Lucidspark writes "Facilitates a lot of the productivity of our working and brainstorming sessions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Miro writes "Easy integrations, in-built templates, and lots of training videos". Lucidspark is most compared with Lucidchart, Figma, MURAL and Jamboard, whereas Miro is most compared with Figma, Lucidchart, Bluescape, Asana and iObeya.

    See our list of best Visual Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Visual Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.