We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT Asset Management and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."
"The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot."
"The technical support is great."
"Provides great functionality."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"Detects new hosts along with vulnerabilities."
"The most recent is VMDR, which provides a comprehensive overview of how to detect, patch, and remediate specific vulnerabilities."
"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit."
"The asset management tool is costly."
"The engineering area needs improvement."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
"Qualys VM's machine learning and artificial intelligence features could be improved."
"It's not very user-friendly at times and requires in-depth understanding. So, a layman or someone new to Qualys won't be able to easily understand it. You need education to use the solution."
"If anything, I would like to see the user interface modernized a bit more."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine IT Asset Management is ranked 11th in IT Asset Management with 3 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 4th in IT Asset Management with 77 reviews. ManageEngine IT Asset Management is rated 9.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT Asset Management writes "Stable and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". ManageEngine IT Asset Management is most compared with Lansweeper, Freshservice, Axonius, ServiceNow and Device42, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Qualys VMDR report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
